HOME | ABOUT | SEARCH | TALKS | COURSES | BOOKS | CHAPTERS | ARTICLES | REVIEWS

      Nicholas Negroponte persuaded many corporations to donate millions of dollars to his Media Lab at MIT by arguing that the print industry (books, magazines, newspapers,etc.), the image industry (movies, television, etc.), and the informatics industry (telecommunications, computer, etc.) would merge into a single huge industry [BRAND, page 10]. The Media Lab could help them position themselves in that new mega-industry. Those Three Interfaces of Negroponte could be considered as an inset in the fourth generation of media. Thus, the triple overlap of those three spheres is the final focus on the Big Story of the co-evolution of the person and media as extensions.

      Until recently, the "end" of this Big Story was an anti-climax. The internet was a solution in search of a problem. It was as if someone had invented the can opener before someone else had invented the can. Warner (in the image industry) acquired Time (in the print industry) and then Time-Warner, in turn, acquired America Online (in the informatics industry) and then lost billions of dollars. Meanwhile, back in Canada, millions of dollars were being lost and hundreds of reputations were being ruined by the failure to break into this mega-industry.

      While those huge multinational corporations were losing millions of dollars trying to move into this fourth generation, young nerds who were more at home in the culture were earning millions of dollars. Jeff Bezos started selling books (that obsolete medium) on the internet and ended up with amazon.com. Pierre Omiyar started by selling trinkets collected by his girl-friend and ended up with eBay.com. To succeed even in a subculture of your own society, you need to know the culture. However, those success stories created nothing really new. Amazon.com is the Walmart of the internet and eBay.com is a gigantic, global garage sale.

      Further, those success stories involve selling stuff. Was the internet not touted as a wonderful means of storing and transmitting information? At Amazon.com, the buyer pays; at eBay.com, the seller pays. Who is going to pay for information? After all, on the internet, information wants to be free or, more accurately, the people who inhabit the internet don't want to pay for it. The Google Guys have figured out how to provide you with the best information available on the internet and how to have advertisers pay for it [VISE & MALSEED].

      1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14     

  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24